If you are reading this, you probably should know that inclusion of disabled students, with the supports they need, is beneficial to all students.
Universal Design is a thing. It means one builds things, and creates products that are accessible to all. It can also be used in classrooms, making sure all students have access to the same education, accommodating individual needs in a flexible environment.
The idea of Universal Design is not about kindness, or about compliance with the ADA. It is about common sense.
When more people participate, everyone wins because human beings learn from each other.
The more we learn, the more we understand each other. When we move beyond the made up idea of “normal”, inclusion is no longer a “task”.
So, why is it still so hard for builders and the ones in charge of making decisions about education practices, to simply adopt and support Universal Design?
Universal Design and Autism Acceptance
You probably also know that Autism Acceptance is very important to me. You might be asking what autism acceptance has to do with Universal Design. Besides the inclusion of Autistic students in schools, Universal Design is also about a mentality of acceptance. It is about valuing the whole person, including the person’s neurology.
Sadly, acceptance of Autistics is still something we don’t see a lot of. There is too much ableism, there are too many people inflating their egos, writing books about how “broken” and “difficult” we are, and being cheered by organizations that supposedly advocate for Autistics – but that rarely listen to us.
ABA, the intervention that causes us so much pain, is the favorite referral of doctors and “specialists” to “fix” us. Since they don’t care about talking to us, they don’t know much about our neurology.
Instead of proposing modifications in the environment that can benefit everyone, their proposal is to “modify” us, causing a lot of counterproductive anxiety and depression.
Accepting Neurological Diversity
Lately, I have seen several articles about synesthesia. It interests me because I am a synesthete. Contrary to the synesthetic subjects of the articles, I don’t paint, I don’t compose masterpieces, I am not an artistic genius. My synesthesia is a very personal experience, and it is not perceived to be a superpower, something that results in art, something that can be shared with others.
The thing is, synesthetic people are, like Autistics, neurodivergent. Researchers and neurologists, when talking about a synesthetic brain, refer to the need of accepting neurological diversity.
““Synesthesia shows you how different sensory perception can be for everyone…”