Over 200 mourners gathered in New York on January 25 for the public funeral service for Avonte Oquendo. The 14-year-old autistic boy’s remains were found in Queen’s by the East River in January. He’d been missing since October 2013.
The search for Avonte was long and intensive, involving 50 members of the NYPD at one point and a detective task force, sewer sweeps conducted by the Department of Environmental Protection, daily checks every subway station in New York by the Metropolitan Transit Authority, and the efforts of total strangers who just wanted to help search. Read more here
Something about the story moved them. Likely it was the idea of an autistic boy being out on his own in a city in which a more “average” fourteen-year-old would have been very vulnerable, and one with disabilities particularly so. Avonte didn’t communicate using spoken language. You would like to think that someone who came across him would take him to a police station or hospital immediately, but we don’t live in that perfect world, do we?
But if the Riverview School (also known as Center Boulevard School), a school for young people with disabilities, had been more on the ball, he wouldn’t have been out there the begin with. I started my research for this blog entry with this CNN article, and had so many “They let what happen?” moments, based on my experience in special education that I wrote nearly 1000 words based on the couple of paragraphs about the school in that article alone. But when I accidentally closed a browser window and had to go searching for an article again, I found a much more detailed accounting of the school’s actions in response to Avonte’s disappearance, with details from the Department of Education’s report into the incident.
It was much worse than I thought.
The Department of Education Report
Here’s the timeline on Avonte’s disappearance on October 4:
– Avonte slipped away from in class while they were walking to the computer lab. The article doesn’t say how large the class was, but three adults were supervising.
– Security cameras show that Avonte reached the first floor of the building at 12:37. He walked past the security desk twice and left through a door that had been left ajar. Four minutes later, the school safety officer shut the door.
– At 12:41, Avonte’s teachers noticed he was missing (according to CNN, it took them “several minutes” to notice that he was gone), but they didn’t notify the assistant principal until 12:56.
– The assistant-principal asked the safety officer to do a perimeter search of the school. The safety officer said that she did not see Avonte leave, and that she’d seen him “run up the stairs”.
– The assistant-principal asked for a soft lockdown of the school, but was denied, as the principal believed it would be too much of a disturbance to another students.
– Almost an hour after Avonte disappeared, the police were called.
– At 2 pm the school was put into full lockdown.
– At approximately 2:45 the administrators finally got access to the cameras. They didn’t have the passwords before then.
There’s not much to say here about what went wrong and what needs to be done, but I will say a couple of things.
– Riverview School knew that Avonte had a tendency to wander. Knowing that, staff should have locked the outside doors, had people searching the grounds, and put a “heads up” call in to the police the moment that teachers realized that Avonte was missing.
– If the safety guard was the one that worked the main security desk every day, she should have known what students would usually be in area alone. Even if she didn’t know Avonte that might wander if unsupervised, seeing him walk past the desk twice should have made her wonder if something was off, and want to investigate further.
– That door shouldn’t have been ajar. Not only can students get out, you can’t predict who will come in – unacceptable in any school right now.
What else can be said about this? We send our children to school each day putting faith in the staff, the Board, and their policies and procedures to keep them safe. The education system must be very vigilant about its policies and procedures, its staff training, and its level of responsiveness, to make sure that it’s up to the challenge, particularly when students who are especially vulnerable due to any reason are involved.
I’m not suggesting for a minute that the staff at Riverview School didn’t care about Avonte Oquendo. But clearly there are issues that need to be addressed, perhaps across the entire Board, considering that a 4-year-old Brooklyn boy left his school alone on January 24 and walked home without a coat on. He’s fine, but parents are pulling him from the school. Read more here
All of this gave Senator Chuck Schumer an idea. On January 27th, he proposed that the federal government provide $10 000 000 toward a tracking device that autistic children could wear on a wrist or carry in a wallet, or have sewn into their clothing. He’s calling it “Avonte’s Law”. U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder has agreed that the idea is sound, and has agreed to let the Justice Department provide the money to local law agencies so that devices can be purchased and distributed immediately to families.
I’m not sure what I think about this. Right or wrong, putting tracking devices on kids makes me think of getting tracking devices implanted on dogs. And now that the 4-year-old in Brooklyn has shown that he might go for a walk if given a chance, do you think that someone will suggest that he carry a tracking device? What about if he was autistic?
Well, I do know what I think of some of it. For federal legislation, $10 000 000 isn’t a lot of money. Is this supposed to cover a device for every family in America who wants it? Even for that, this just seems like, “We should do something, so let’s toss a small amount of money at it” money.
If they were really concerned, they’d put some real money into this and put it some supports into place for autistic children – support for families, training for school staff, upgrading for buildings, more money in special education budgets for programming… maybe even education for parents and professionals by autism experts about wandering, to deal with the issue at its roots and give people tools that they can use.
Because I wonder about the issues around surveillance and right to privacy that these devices will inevitably raise, and about the autistic children who, due to sensory issues, perhaps, will simply refuse to wear a device.
But I’m not the mother of an autistic child, and I’ve read some parent blogs and talked to some parents about this proposed legislation since I’ve heard about it. I’ve heard stories about the constant vigilance, the anxiety and fear that wandering causes in parents who feel powerless in the face of their autistic child’s will to leave safe spaces. And putting myself in Avonte’s mother’s space, as best as I can…imagining the prospect of searching for my child for months, only to have the police find pieces of him…I imagine that I’d be saying, “Give me the device, now. I want to know where my child is at all times.”
If it could keep a tragedy from happening, how could I not take it?
No easy answer. Just a boy that won’t be coming home to his family. Rest in peace, Avonte.